1956 AC Aceca vs. 2002 GMC Terra 4
To start off, 2002 GMC Terra 4 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 GMC Terra 4 weights approximately 1380 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 GMC Terra 4 has automatic transmission and 1956 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 1956 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 GMC Terra 4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 2002 GMC Terra 4 | |
Make | AC | GMC |
Model | Aceca | Terra 4 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 2270 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2950 mm |