1956 AC Aceca vs. 2002 Pininfarina Start
To start off, 2002 Pininfarina Start is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Pininfarina Start is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pininfarina Start (200 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pininfarina Start should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Pininfarina Start has automatic transmission and 1956 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 1956 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Pininfarina Start will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca | 2002 Pininfarina Start | |
| Make | AC | Pininfarina |
| Model | Aceca | Start |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 200 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2520 mm |
