1956 AC Aceca vs. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro
To start off, 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro weights approximately 1606 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca.
Because 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro has automatic transmission and 1956 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 1956 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 2003 Audi Pikes Peak Quattro | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | Pikes Peak Quattro |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 2500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1750 mm |