1956 AC Aceca vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, 2004 Ford E-150 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1233 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Aceca. (168 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Aceca | E-150 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 388 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 2127 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 132 L |