1956 AC Aceca vs. 2005 Chevrolet Spark
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 AC Aceca weights approximately 114 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Spark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Spark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 2005 Chevrolet Spark | |
Make | AC | Chevrolet |
Model | Aceca | Spark |
Year Released | 1956 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 796 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 776 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 35 L |