1956 AC Aceca vs. 2006 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2006 Toyota Tundra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota Tundra (236 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 465 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 2006 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Aceca | Tundra |
Year Released | 1956 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 236 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 100 L |