1956 AC Aceca vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2007 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca.
Because 1956 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca | 2007 Renault Clio | |
| Make | AC | Renault |
| Model | Aceca | Clio |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1770 mm |
