1956 AC Aceca vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 AC Aceca (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 AC Aceca weights approximately 290 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca | 2009 Tata Nano | |
| Make | AC | Tata |
| Model | Aceca | Nano |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 37 L |
