1956 AC Aceca vs. 2010 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2010 Subaru Outback is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Outback (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Subaru Outback weights approximately 665 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 2010 Subaru Outback | |
Make | AC | Subaru |
Model | Aceca | Outback |
Year Released | 1956 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 890 kg | 1555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 70 L |