1956 AC Aceca vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca.
Because 2011 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 2011 Audi R8 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | R8 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 90 L |