1956 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 5,200 cc (10 cylinders), 2012 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (525 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 402 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca.
Because 2012 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (530 Nm) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 AC Aceca. (168 Nm). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 AC Aceca. 2012 Audi R8 has automatic transmission and 1956 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 1956 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi R8 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 AC Aceca | 2012 Audi R8 | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Aceca | R8 |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 525 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Torque | 168 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4435 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1905 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1245 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 90 L |
