1956 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca.
Because 2012 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1956 AC Aceca has manual transmission. 1956 AC Aceca will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 AC Aceca | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | TT |
Year Released | 1956 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 60 L |