1956 AC Aceca vs. 2012 Renault Clio

To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 AC Aceca would be higher. At 1,971 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 AC Aceca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (81 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1956 AC Aceca. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1956 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 285 kg more than 1956 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1956 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1956 AC Aceca 2012 Renault Clio
Make AC Renault
Model Aceca Clio
Year Released 1956 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1971 cc 1460 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 74 HP 81 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 3750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 890 kg 1175 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 3990 mm
Vehicle Width 1560 mm 2030 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1710 mm
Wheelbase Size 2290 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 55 L