1956 Alfa Romeo 1900 vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900. (114 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900.
Because 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Alfa Romeo 1900. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Alfa Romeo 1900 | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Ford |
Model | 1900 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1956 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1974 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |