1956 Alvis TC 108 G vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Alvis TC 108 G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Alvis TC 108 G would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1956 Alvis TC 108 G. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1956 Alvis TC 108 G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Alvis TC 108 G weights approximately 740 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Alvis TC 108 G (222 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus M250. (180 Nm). This means 1956 Alvis TC 108 G will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus M250.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Alvis TC 108 G | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
Make | Alvis | Lotus |
Model | TC 108 G | M250 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 222 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2520 mm |