1956 Alvis TC 108 G vs. 2008 Audi TT
To start off, 2008 Audi TT is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Alvis TC 108 G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Alvis TC 108 G would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Alvis TC 108 G is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Alvis TC 108 G weights approximately 155 kg more than 2008 Audi TT.
Because 1956 Alvis TC 108 G is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Alvis TC 108 G. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Audi TT (280 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Alvis TC 108 G. (222 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Alvis TC 108 G.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Alvis TC 108 G | 2008 Audi TT | |
Make | Alvis | Audi |
Model | TC 108 G | TT |
Year Released | 1956 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 222 Nm | 280 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2470 mm |