1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 1950 Riley RM A
To start off, 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,290 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire weights approximately 415 kg more than 1950 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire | 1950 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Riley |
| Model | Sapphire | RM A |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1950 |
| Engine Size | 2290 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1650 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2870 mm |
