1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,290 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Ford |
| Model | Sapphire | 12 M |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2290 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2500 mm |
