1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1974 Volvo 140 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 2,307 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire (85 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire (160 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (157 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Volvo |
Model | Sapphire | 140 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2620 mm |