1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 2007 Holden UTE
To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (160 Nm). This means 2007 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire | 2007 Holden UTE | |
Make | Armstrong Siddeley | Holden |
Model | Sapphire | UTE |
Year Released | 1956 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2307 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |