1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 2010 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2010 Holden Caprice is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 259 more horse power than 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. (160 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. 2010 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire has manual transmission. 1956 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: