1956 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2002 Toyota ES 3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Aston Martin DB3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Aston Martin DB3 weights approximately 305 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 1956 Aston Martin DB3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Aston Martin DB3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Toyota ES 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Aston Martin DB3 | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Toyota |
Model | DB3 | ES 3 |
Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2922 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1640 mm |