1956 Austin A 30 vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1985 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 495 kg more than 1956 Austin A 30.
Because 1956 Austin A 30 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 30. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 30 | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Austin | Plymouth |
Model | A 30 | Sundance |
Year Released | 1956 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 802 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2470 mm |