1956 Austin A 30 vs. 1996 Daewoo Nexia
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Nexia is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Nexia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Nexia (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 30. (28 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 30.
Because 1956 Austin A 30 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 30. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Daewoo Nexia (138 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 30. (54 Nm). This means 1996 Daewoo Nexia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 30. 1996 Daewoo Nexia has automatic transmission and 1956 Austin A 30 has manual transmission. 1956 Austin A 30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Daewoo Nexia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 30 | 1996 Daewoo Nexia | |
Make | Austin | Daewoo |
Model | A 30 | Nexia |
Year Released | 1956 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 802 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 54 Nm | 138 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |