1956 Austin A 30 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJ is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 273 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 30. (28 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 1120 kg more than 1956 Austin A 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 487 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 30. (54 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 30. 2002 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1956 Austin A 30 has manual transmission. 1956 Austin A 30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: