1956 Austin A 30 vs. 2002 Seat Inca Kombi

To start off, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 30. (28 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 355 kg more than 1956 Austin A 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1956 Austin A 30 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 30. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 30. (54 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 30.

Compare all specifications: