1956 Austin A 35 vs. 1983 Nissan Bluebird

To start off, 1983 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 1,950 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Nissan Bluebird (57 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 521 kg more than 1956 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1956 Austin A 35 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 35. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Bluebird, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Nissan Bluebird (113 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1983 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 35.

Compare all specifications: