1956 Austin A 35 vs. 2000 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2000 Dodge Viper is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 7,999 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Viper (450 HP) has 416 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 35. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 35.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Viper (664 Nm) has 596 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 35 | 2000 Dodge Viper | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 35 | Viper |
Year Released | 1956 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 946 cc | 7999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 450 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 664 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 98.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2450 mm |