1956 Austin A 35 vs. 2004 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Neon (132 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Neon weights approximately 422 kg more than 1956 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Austin A 35 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 35. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Neon (176 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 35. (68 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 35 | 2004 Dodge Neon | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 35 | Neon |
Year Released | 1956 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 946 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 749 kg | 1171 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 47 L |