1956 Austin A 35 vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 35. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 886 kg more than 1956 Austin A 35. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Austin A 35 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 35. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac BLS (365 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin A 35 | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 35 | BLS |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 946 cc | 2792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 365 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 89.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 74.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 749 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 58 L |
