1956 Austin A 35 vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 35. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 35 would be higher. At 999 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 35. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 35.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Smart ForTwo (121 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 35. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Smart ForTwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 35.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 35 | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Austin | Smart |
Model | A 35 | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1956 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 946 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 72.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 81.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 33 L |