1956 Austin A 40 vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1960 Nissan Cedric is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 40.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Nissan Cedric (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1960 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1956 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2540 mm |