1956 Austin A 40 vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 40 weights approximately 88 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 40. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1972 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 40 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1956 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2210 mm |