1956 Austin A 40 vs. 1975 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1975 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin A 40 (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1975 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1975 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 40 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1975 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin A 40 (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1956 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 1975 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Austin | Suzuki |
Model | A 40 | Fronte |
Year Released | 1956 | 1975 |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 42 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 30 L |