1956 Austin A 40 vs. 1980 Fiat Panda
To start off, 1980 Fiat Panda is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Fiat Panda (48 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Fiat Panda should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 40 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1980 Fiat Panda.
Because 1956 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Fiat Panda (147 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 40. (79 Nm). This means 1980 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 1980 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 40 | Panda |
Year Released | 1956 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 48 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 147 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 820 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2450 mm |