1956 Austin A 40 vs. 1987 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1987 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Buick Skyhawk (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 50 kg more than 1956 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1956 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 1987 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 40 | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 1956 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2580 mm |