1956 Austin A 40 vs. 1989 Lotus Carlton
To start off, 1989 Lotus Carlton is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,615 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Lotus Carlton is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Lotus Carlton (569 Nm) has 490 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 40. (79 Nm). This means 1989 Lotus Carlton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 1989 Lotus Carlton | |
Make | Austin | Lotus |
Model | A 40 | Carlton |
Year Released | 1956 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 3615 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 79 Nm | 569 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2750 mm |