1956 Austin A 40 vs. 1991 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1991 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,452 cc, 1991 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 70 kg more than 1956 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 1991 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 40 | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1956 | 1991 |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1452 cc |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1910 mm |