1956 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Dodge Ram
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 12 kg more than 1956 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 347 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 40. (100 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 1996 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 40 | Ram |
Year Released | 1956 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 5200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1062 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3530 mm |