1956 Austin A 40 vs. 1996 Renault Fifties
To start off, 1996 Renault Fifties is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Renault Fifties (60 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Renault Fifties should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Fifties weights approximately 545 kg more than 1956 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 1996 Renault Fifties | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | Fifties |
Year Released | 1956 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1099 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 60 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |