1956 Austin A 40 vs. 1997 Mazda SW-X
To start off, 1997 Mazda SW-X is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda SW-X weights approximately 55 kg more than 1956 Austin A 40.
Because 1956 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mazda SW-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Mazda SW-X has automatic transmission and 1956 Austin A 40 has manual transmission. 1956 Austin A 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mazda SW-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 1997 Mazda SW-X | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 40 | SW-X |
Year Released | 1956 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1105 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 55 L |