1956 Austin A 40 vs. 2002 Nissan Avenir
To start off, 2002 Nissan Avenir is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Avenir is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Avenir weights approximately 450 kg more than 1956 Austin A 40.
Because 2002 Nissan Avenir is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan Avenir will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Nissan Avenir has automatic transmission and 1956 Austin A 40 has manual transmission. 1956 Austin A 40 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Nissan Avenir will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin A 40 | 2002 Nissan Avenir | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 40 | Avenir |
| Year Released | 1956 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2630 mm |
