1956 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2011 Nissan Leaf is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 40 would be higher.
Because 1956 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 40 | 2011 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Leaf |
Year Released | 1956 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |