1956 Austin A 90 vs. 1963 Holden EJ

To start off, 1963 Holden EJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin A 90 (85 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 90 weights approximately 186 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin A 90 (168 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM). This means 1956 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.

Compare all specifications:

1956 Austin A 90 1963 Holden EJ
Make Austin Holden
Model A 90 EJ
Year Released 1956 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2639 cc 2262 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 85 HP 64 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4200 RPM
Torque 168 Nm 163 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 1400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1320 kg 1134 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2680 mm