1956 Austin A 90 vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1965 Seat 600 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 90 weights approximately 745 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1956 Austin A 90 (168 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1956 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 90 | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Austin | Seat |
Model | A 90 | 600 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 168 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1620 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2010 mm |