1956 Austin A 90 vs. 1967 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (276 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 90. (85 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 90 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Camaro (481 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 90. (168 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1967 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 90.

Compare all specifications:

1956 Austin A 90 1967 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Austin Chevrolet
Model A 90 Camaro
Year Released 1956 1967
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2639 cc 5354 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 85 HP 276 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 168 Nm 481 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1320 kg 1315 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 76 L