1956 Austin A 90 vs. 1984 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron (124 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 90. (85 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 90 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1984 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 1956 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 90 | 1984 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 90 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1956 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2580 mm |