1956 Austin A 90 vs. 2000 Mazda Premacy

To start off, 2000 Mazda Premacy is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mazda Premacy (90 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 90. (85 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mazda Premacy should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 90.

Because 1956 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda Premacy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda Premacy (220 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Austin A 90. (168 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2000 Mazda Premacy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Austin A 90.

Compare all specifications:

1956 Austin A 90 2000 Mazda Premacy
Make Austin Mazda
Model A 90 Premacy
Year Released 1956 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2639 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 85 HP 90 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 168 Nm 220 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1320 kg 1320 kg
Vehicle Length 4350 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1620 mm 1610 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 64 L