1956 Austin A 95 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1956 Austin A 95. (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1956 Austin A 95. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1956 Austin A 95. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1956 Austin A 95 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Austin | Cadillac |
Model | A 95 | 62 |
Year Released | 1956 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2639 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 98.4 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 2090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 79 L |