1956 Austin A 95 vs. 1963 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1963 Lotus Seven is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Austin A 95. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Austin A 95 would be higher. At 2,639 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Austin A 95 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 Austin A 95 (92 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1956 Austin A 95 should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 Austin A 95 weights approximately 920 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1956 Austin A 95 | 1963 Lotus Seven | |
| Make | Austin | Lotus |
| Model | A 95 | Seven |
| Year Released | 1956 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2639 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 92 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 430 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 29 L |
